Write A Letter To An Official About Proposition 8

keeposition 3 : Children s Hospital Bond Act . surrender Program landosition 3 , which is to be voted on the November 4 , 2008 election asks Sh every(prenominal) 980 ,000 ,000 in general obligation bonds be classical for construction , elaborateness , remodeling , renovation , furnishing and equipping of eligible children s hospitals Hospitals that receive funding downstairs bear 3 would be required to rear door-to-door services to a high volume of children eligible for political programs and congruous other requirements (League of Women Voters of atomic number 20 2008 . Under Prop 3 , 20 percent of the money generated by the sale of these bonds would go to the five University of atomic number 20 general acute sustentation hospitals , eon 80 percent would be distributed to hospitals that treat children with leukemia , cancer , centre of attention defects , diabetes , sickle cell anemia , cystic fibrosis , and other heartrending unhingednesses . The cost of Prop 3 would depend on the use up rates of the bonds sold however , the California legislative psychoanalyst (2008 ) estimated that the off everywhere a 30 year dot , for an annual cost of about 64 millionAnalysis of LegislationSupporters of Prop 3 claim that the additional funds are needed if California is to be expected to meet the medical needs of its children California is expected to experience a 35 percent increment in the number of children living in the state over the next 20 years (ImagineWithUs .org , 2008 . The hospitals that are expected to meet the eligibility requirements of Prop 3 currently handle 88 of the yardbird care for children who need heart surgery 97 of all surgery for children who need organ trans platformts and 71 of inpatient care for children with cancer (ImagineWithUs .org , 2008 . Supporters of Prop 3 break noted that in that location is already a shortage of hospital beds and other healthcare facilities for children Prop . 3 To Raise 980M For Children s Hospitals .

As the number of children in California increases , there will be an even greater need for additional hospital beds , equipment , and other facilitiesProp 3 whitethorn be viewed as a continuation of a plan to improve the delivery of healthcare services to seriously ill children living in California that began in 2004 when California voters clear Proposition 61 . Under Prop 61 , voters authorized the sale of 750 million in general obligation bonds to provide funding for children s hospitals . As of June 1 of this year 403 million , or 53 percent of the funds generated by Prop 61 , had been awarded to eligible hospitals . Prop 3 is intended to ensure that these funds continue to meet the medical needs of the future . Prop 61 established a set of criteria to be utilise to determine whether a hospital was eligible for funding . Prop 3 uses these same criteria to determine whether hospitals are eligible (California Legislative Analyst , 2008Opponents of Prop 3 have claimed that the measure is excess . To support their claims , those who are opposed to Prop 3 have pointed out that 47 percent of the funds generated by Prop 61 have not been awarded...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .