You are the important editor of a large metropolitan daily paper. One of your newspersons is caught fabricating sources and making up facts. How do you treat the situation, from disciplining the reporter to explaining it to your readers?  Fabricating sources and making up facts for a public theme is a serious offense and should not be taken lightly. Audiences depend on news media for accurate information regarding catamenia events. So if the paper is printing lies then the readers forget observe deceived because they trusted the newspaper to give even information. If I were the chief editor for a large metropolitan daily newspaper and I caught one of my reporters fabricating sources and making up facts I would emphatically fire the reporter. It is a reporter’s responsibility to detect not only company guidelines but ethical guidelines in like manner and if a reporter cannot follow those guidelines then they should no longish be a reporter. However, before firing the reporter I would find out which small stories that were hold out were written victimisation false information. After acquiring this information I would run a story in the paper explaining the situation regarding the reporter’s delinquent actions. In this article I would lay the stories that were published using false information and identify the exact information that was made up. At the end of the article would be a statement apologizing to the readers for the lies that were printed.
In this apology statement to the readers I would also include a promise to be more thorough when reviewing stories that are going to be published. I would roundabout a new company rule that would require reporters to shit proof that the information in the article is true and correct before it can be published. Any reporter that breaks such(prenominal) rules will have consequences. The first offense will be let go with a warning. The second offense will require a face to face meeting in the midst of management and the reporter at fault. The reporter will be put on...
In this apology statement to the readers I would also include a promise to be more thorough when reviewing stories that are going to be published. I would roundabout a new company rule that would require reporters to shit proof that the information in the article is true and correct before it can be published. Any reporter that breaks such(prenominal) rules will have consequences. The first offense will be let go with a warning. The second offense will require a face to face meeting in the midst of management and the reporter at fault. The reporter will be put on...
Is this the right essay for you?
or
If you wishing to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.
No comments:
Post a Comment