2d 497 (1935 )] , the Supreme Court of California has clearly laid down the proposition that a person divest of reason and understanding by reason of drunkenness may avoid a contract entered into in such discipline notwithstanding the fact that his condition may have been ca utilize by his voluntary act . In the instant case , Mr .Bibe was exclusively without understanding to enter into a contract as he was in a state of intoxicationIn fact , you have used undue influence and fraudulent practices to induce Mr .Bibe to sign on the which purported to be an agreement to sell the coffee shop . In the light of the decisions in Donnelly v Rees , 141 Cal . 56 (1903 ) and Marron v . Marron , 19 Cal .App . 326 (1912 , a deed procured in such circumstances is liable(p) to be set aside...If you want to get a entire essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment