The Main Point Of The Reading

NameProfessorSubjectDateOf brainless Mice and MenRenowned commentator , writer and psychiatrist , Charles Krauthammer disapproves of copy and allowance of the natural course of bearing in his article , Of Headless Mice and Men (1998 . The article was written at the time when the discipline on cloning was very contentious due to the cloning of Dolly , a female domestic sheep . Krauthammer stated that employ of technology has gotten out of control with the production of altered life forms . Moreover , the benefit of cloning cannot pay off the indemnity it renders to its subjects . There is an enormous ethical and moral breadth that should be considered before executing such(prenominal) undertakings .

The author calls for the need of conterminous action from the country s officials to address this issueOne of the arguments Krauthammer presented was that given the available technology that can be used for the advantage of many such as immortality and recurrence of extinct creatures , human s perception of the measure of life will findm to shrink instead of deepen . The author has , therefore , described this whole picture as high-tech barbarity In animal testing , we see thousands of animal subjects die with only a countable some that survives . In human testing , similar phenomenon is not cold from occurringAs much as most of want to improve our authority of life , there are regulations that need to be detect . Cloning , if pursued , may provide the needs of peck but we cannot say that it will not have perverting effects...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .