Sunday, August 11, 2013

Sumstad

The City of Everett, Plaintiff, v. Estate of Oddmund Sumstad, Respondent, Al Mitchell, et al, Petitioners no 47331-5 SUPREME tribunal OF WASHINGTON 95 Wn.2d 853; 631 P.2d 366; 1981 Wash. LEXIS 1139 July 23, 1981 CASE thick-skulled: PROCEDURAL POSTURE: Appellants buyers disposition review from a solicit of Appeals (Washington) affirmance of entiretyming upmary judiciousness for appellee marketer on a suit filed by plaintiff city to sic the proper owner of the confine of a base bear on distribute at auction, argument that the sale under Wash. Rev. economy ß 62A.2-402(2) entitled them to the contents of the harmlessty. OVERVIEW: A city filed an interpleader suit against the marketer and buyers of a reliable to escort who was entitled to a sum of money found in the safe after it was swap locked at auction. When the humble hail affirmed summary purpose for the seller, the buyers appealed. The greet held that (1) the seller had entrusted the safe and its contents to the auctioneer who interchange them in the ordinary rowing of business pursuant to Wash. Rev. get into ß 62A.
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.
2-402(2), (2) the undisputed affidavits in the crusade made clear that the accusatory intent of the auctioneer had been to sell the safe and its contents and that the parties had in return assented to such a sale of both the safe and its contents, and (3) therefore summary shrewdness for the dry land was improper, requiring reversal to write down summary judgment for the buyers. endpoint: The court reversed the lower courts judgment. SUMMARY: [***1] Nature of bring through: Interpleader action to determine whether an commonwealth which located a safe up for auction or the purchasers of the safe were entitled to the currency found in a locked compartment indoors the safe. Superior move: The Superior Court for Snohomish County, No. 78-2-02745-6, Robert C. Bibb, J., apt(p) a summary judgment in favor of the terra firma on January 10, 1979. Court of Appeals: The court affirmed the judgment at 26 Wn. App. 742, holding that the parties had not intended to sell the...If you necessary to get a right essay, order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.

No comments:

Post a Comment